O. Menshov1, Cand. Sci. (Geol.), Postdoctoral Student, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF THE SOUTHERN CHERNOZEMS
OF UKRAINE, CASE STUDY FROM ODESSA REGION
1 Department of Geophysics, Institute of Geology, Taras Schevchenko National University of Kyiv, 90 Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, 03022 Ukraine
Soil studies are an important component of the present geological and geophysical studies to solve fundamental and applied problems. According to the new Law on Higher Education different fields of research were combined into the Earth Sciences in conformity with the international classification. The integrated approach for investigations in geology, geography, soil science, geophysics is an extremely urgent task now. We studied an area on the Black Sea coast, in the coastal part of the Odessa region, near the Sanzheyka steppe area, which was not subjected to agricultural processing. Landscape conditions are the flat part with the high precipice near the seashore. The soils of this area are classified as southern chernozems (Haplic Chernozems in WRB classification). The methods used include reconnaissance soil science research, bulk magnetic susceptibility measurements in the field, soil sampling for the laboratory analysis. In the magnetometric laboratory we measured mass specific magnetic susceptibility χ, the frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χfd. The results showed that the magnetic susceptibility of the upper humus horizon A is 80-100×10-8 m3/kg. The compacted soil of the field roads presented χ=130-180×10-8 m3/kg. At the same time the clay roads with eroded soil are characterized by the values of χ=50-70×10-8 m3/kg. This indicates the replacement of the upper humus horizon by transitional horizon B. This confirms the soil erosion processes, which in turn is proved by the magnetic susceptibility study of soil horizons within the soil profile. The transitional horizon B was identified at a depth of 40-70 cm with magnetic susceptibility 70-80×10-8 m3/kg. The underlying bedrocks C started from the 80 cm with χ=30-40×10-8 m3/kg. The southern chernozems are one of the most magnetic soils in Ukraine. The topsoil of the Ukraine chernozem contains fine-grained oxidized magnetite and maghemite of pedogenic origin. The frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χfd is 4-10%. This indicates the presence of superparamagnetic grains among the magnetic materials in the soils. Pedogenesis predominates in the studied soils. Soil pollution wasn't identified. Southen chernozems are extremely magnetic and should be investigated during magnetic surveys and environmental monitoring to develop an optimal cost-based methodology and enhance the uniqueness of the interpretation of the results. For example, we identified the area with high erosion risks. This clay road is allocated by the contrast magnetic signal. The detailed information on magnetic minerals, grain size and stability, areal distribution of the magnetic susceptibility should be involved for a more accurate interpretation of the obtained soil magnetic parameters data to assess soil erosion. We need to combine the magnetic methods with agronomic risk assessment of erosion processes within the productive lands.
Key words: magnetic susceptibility, soil magnetism, soil erosion, southern chernozems, Haplic Chernozems.
1. Abd-Elmabod S. K., Jordán A., Fleskens L., Van der Ploeg P., Muñoz-Rojas M., Anaya-Romero M., Van der Salm R. J., De la Rosa D., (2015). Modelling agricultural suitability along soil transects under current conditions and improved scenario of soil factors. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 17, EGU2015-1012-2.
2. Armstrong A., Quinton J.N., Maher B.A., (2012). Thermal enhancement of natural magnetism as a tool for tracing eroded soil. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 37, 1567–1572.
3. Bardgett R., Szukics U., Schermer M., Lavorel S., Lamarque P., Tappeiner U., Turner K., Steinbacher M., (2011). Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change, 11, 791–804.
4. Chen L. M., Zhang G. L., Rossiter D. G., Cao Z. H., (2015). Magnetic depletion and enhancement in the evolution of paddy and non-paddy soil chronosequences. European Journal of Soil Science, 66, 5, 886-897.
5. Evans M.E., Heller F., (2003). Environmental magnetism. Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics. International Geophysics series, 86, Elsevier science.
6. Francis R.A., Krishnamurthy K., (2013). Human conflict and ecosystem services: finding the environmental price of warfare. International Affairs, 90, 853-869.
7. Furst C., Lorz C., Zirlewagen D., Makeschin F., (2010). Testing the Indicative Value of Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements for Concluding on Site Potentials and Risks Provoked by Fly Ash Deposition. Environmental Management, 46, 894–907.
8. Gubbins D., Herrerobervera E., (2007). Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism, Springer.
9. Guerra C., Pinto-Correia T., Metzger M., (2014). Mapping Soil Erosion Prevention Using an Ecosystem Service Modeling Framework for Integrated Land Management and Policy. Ecosystems, 17, 878–889.
10. Hendriks C., Stoorvogel J., Claessens L., (2015). Lots of legacy soil data are available, but which data do we need to collect for regional land use analysis?. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 17, EGU 2015-905.
11. Jeleńska M., Hasso-Agopsowicz A., Kądziałko-Hofmokl M., Sukhorada A., Bondar K., (2008). Magnetic iron oxides occurring in chernozem soil from Ukraine and Poland as indicators of pedogenic processes. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 52, 255-270.
12. Jordanova D., Jordanova N., Atanasova A., Tsacheva T., Petrov P., (2011). Soil tillage erosion by using magnetism of soils – a case study from Bulgaria. Environ. Monit. Assess, 183, 381-394.
13. Jordanova D., Jordanova N., Werban U., (2013). Environmental significance of magnetic properties of Gley soils near Rosslau (Germany). Environ Earth Sci., 69, 1719–1732
14. Kapička A., Dlouha S., Grison H., Jaksik O., Petrovsky E., Kodesova R., (2013). Magnetic properties of soils - A basis for erosion study at agricultural land in Southern Moravia. 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, 577-584.
15. Lourenço A., Esteves I., Rocha A., Abrantes I., Gomes C., (2015). Relation between magnetic parameters and nematode bundance in agricultural soils of Portugal—a multidisciplinary study in the scope of environmental magnetism. Environ. Monit. Assess, 187:162, DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4373-1
16. Menshov O., Kuderavets R., Vyzhva S., Chobotok I., Pastushenko T., (2015). Magnetic mapping and soil magnetometry of hydrocarbon prospective areas in western Ukraine. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 59, 1-14.
17. Menshov O. Pereira P., Kruglov O., (2015). Spatial variability of soil magnetic susceptibility in an agricultural field located in Eastern Ukraine. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 17, EGU2015-578-2.
18. Menshov O., Sukhorada A., (2010). Magnetic Properties of Ukraine Soils and Their Informational Content. 72th EAGE Conference & Exhibition – Barcelona, Spain, 14-17 June 2010, http://www.earthdoc.org/detail.php?pubid=39881.
19. Perez I., Martın F., Zamora R.O., Gutierrez-Ruiz M.E., (2014). Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity as a proxy for evaluating soil contaminated with arsenic, cadmium and lead in a metallurgical area in the San Luis Potosi State, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci ., 72, 1521–1531.
20. Yang H., Xiong H., Chen X., Wang Y., Zhang F., (2015). Identifying the influence of urbanization on soil organic matter content and pH from soil magnetic characteristics. Journal Arid Land, 7(6), 820-830.
21. Yang P. G., Yang M., Mao R. Z., Byrne J. M., (2015). Impact of Long-Term Irrigation with Treated Sewage on Soil Magnetic Susceptibility and Organic Matter Content in North China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 95, 1, 102-107.
22. Vernander N.B., Godlin M.M., Sambur G.N., Skorina S.A., (1951). Pochvy UkSSR. Kiev, p. 326. (In Russian).
23. Shkvaruk N.M., Delemchuk N.I., (1976). Pochvovedenie. Kiev, Vyscha shkola, p. 320. (In Russian).